• darq@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Rejecting gender ideology isn’t bigotry.

    Referring to a demographic as an ideology generally is bigotry, though.

        • transigence@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          26
          ·
          1 year ago

          Referring to gender ideology as gender ideology is putting a tidy label to a set of ideas, and makes no reference to any people whatsoever.

          • darq@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, sorry, I’m not willing to play your stupid little word game where you try to semantically differentiate a demographic from the “ideology” that that demographic meaningfully exists and should have the right to pursue happiness in society.

            The set of ideas that you refer to includes the ideas that transgender people exist as transgender, and non-binary people exist as non-binary.

          • JBloodthorn@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The only choice involved in being trans is the choice to let everyone else know (or not). They are a demographic, not an ideology.

            • transigence@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              The concept of “trans” is part of gender ideology. They are people with an identity disorder. Conceptualizing them as “trans” can only exist if you subscribe to the concept of gender in the first place, and gender only exists as an abstraction in the minds of gender ideologues (and people who don’t know any better, who have been duped by gender ideologues).

              • JBloodthorn@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                False. Like, completely and totally wrong. The science is clear, and you are on the side opposite of it. There are experts on one side, and you on the other. It is amazing just how many incorrect statements you are barfing out.