Perhaps I’ve misunderstood how Lemmy works, but from what I can tell Lemmy is resulting in fragmentation between communities. If I’ve got this wrong, or browsing Lemmy wrong, please correct me!

I’ll try and explain this with an example comparison to Reddit.

As a reddit user I can go to /r/technology and see all posts from any user to the technology subreddit. I can interact with any posts and communicate with anyone on that subreddit.

In Lemmy, I understand that I can browse posts from other instances from Beehaw, for example I could check out /c/technology@slrpnk.net, /c/tech@lemmy.fmhy.ml, or many of the other technology communities from other instances, but I can’t just open up /c/technology in Beehaw and have a single view across the technology community. There could be posts I’m interested in on the technology@slrpnk instance but I wouldn’t know about it unless I specifically look at it, which adds up to a horrible experience of trying to see the latest tech news and conversation.

This adds up to a huge fragmentation across what was previously a single community.

Have I got this completely wrong?

Do you think this will change over time where one community on a specific instance will gain the market share and all others will evaporate away? And if it does, doesn’t that just place us back in the reddit situation?

EDIT: commented a reply here: https://beehaw.org/comment/288898. Thanks for the discussion helping me understand what this is (and isnt!)

  • Otome-chan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What you need to understand is that “lemmy instances slrpnk, lemmy.fmhy.ml, beehaw.org collectively are reddit” is not correct. The proper analogy is that beehaw.org alone is reddit. And then beehaw.org is linking up with other “reddits”.

    The technology communities in those different instances are their own thing. They aren’t “the same one community split fragmented” they’re separate communities.

    so while I can post in here on technology@beehaw.org it’s very much the case and obvious to me that it’s separate from the magazines we have here on kbin. we have our technology@kbin.social which is our technology community. and this technology on beehaw simply happens to be another technology community that I can see and participate in.

    In practice, what results is that people interested in these topics will generally subscribe to all of them if they want to see all of the content. but they aren’t the same thing.

    I know y’all here on beehaw have some pretty emphasized posting guidelines that simply don’t exist elsewhere on the fediverse. as a result, whenever I’m in a beehaw community I make sure to not kick the hornets nest (sorry I couldn’t help but make the pun). but on the communities here on kbin? yes I happily participate more comfortably.

    tl;dr: they’re different communities, not the same community split among instances.

    edit: it’s also worth noting that us kbinauts aren’t even using lemmy, and neither are the mastodon users who sometimes participate in these threads.

    • effingjoe@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m hoping (actually, expecting-- if we’re being honest) that features are added to reddit-esque apps like lemmy and kbin that allow you to make personal groups of magazines/communities. This would very nearly solve the fragmentation “problem”. Better yet if they add a way to share these personal groups to be imported by others.

      Then we would get the benefits that come with decentralization, but without the detriments that come along with it.

    • aeternum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Very well put. I’d like to add, that it’s actually a good thing that the fediverse is “fragmented” because then the power vacuum that happened on reddit can’t easily happen here.

      • masterspace@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s an upside, but it’s not necessarily a “good” thing to be fragmented if it means you don’t have the network effects to make a satisfying community.

        End of the day a lot of Reddit’s value came from its popularity.

        • PabloDiscobar@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          End of the day a lot of Reddit’s value came from its popularity.

          Value to who? Not to me. I saw subs I liked nosedive because of popularity. I saw the network effect force me to unsubscribe and search elsewhere.

          I can even give you an estimate of the number of subscribers required to kill a sub, between 70k and 300k, depending on the theme of the sub. This is when the peanut gallery joins in and the spectators become the showrunners.

          But value to the shareholders? Sure! More people, more ad revenues.

          • Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s a sweet spot. A dead forum is of no use to anyone. Reddit had a good few years where there were enough users to have a good exchange of information, and not a sea of low effort posts. I think it all changed when they started advertising their app and “new reddit” on Facebook.

            • PabloDiscobar@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well, define “dead”, because in your terms beehaw/lemmy is dead and still everyone wants to be a part of it.

              People need to fight this fear of missing out. There are people here who suggest that we should run bots to mirror reddit. That would be a disaster.

              • Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                because in your terms beehaw/lemmy is dead

                Huh? No, I’d say the opposite, the fediverse is in the sweet spot right now.

          • LChitman@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ugh, yes, it’s unfortunate that popularity ruined so many subs. We’ve all watched a tonne of them turn into generic repost mills over the years.

    • Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago
      1. I love that “kbinauts” is gaining traction

      2. I wish kbin made it more obvious what instance a given thread in your feed is from. If it’s from lemmy, I know I can post memes and I should be prepared for flame wars. If it’s from beehaw, I know I can have a thoughtful and respectful conversation. I’m okay with either, but I don’t want to accidentally write an essay on lemmy that no one will read, or pick a fight on beehaw with someone who had no ill intent.

      If it’s from kbin I know we’ll spend some time talking about how great everything is and how we’re all just stoked to be here 😁