• moakley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    map destruction skin thrown on top

    That doesn’t make sense if you think about it for a second. The entire game is designed around the destructible environments. One of the reasons it’s so good is that they use the interior of the landscape. And the gameplay loop is absolutely different.

    But Nintendo also gets credit for Super Mario Galaxy; you’re right about that.

    • BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s a meaningful difference, but it’s still, at its core, “go into level, do little challenges to find a thing and progress the story”, except this time it’s banana instead of star.

      • moakley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Next you’ll tell me they both have jumping!

        I mean that’s all really high level stuff.

        • BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m not saying you can’t enjoy the game but it’s not that different from Super Mario Odyssey. Its from the same development team, and you can clearly see they have a certain design that works.

          • moakley@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            And I’m not saying you do have to enjoy the game. I’m just saying that you’re starting with the opinion “Nintendo bad” and trying to backfill the reasons, because saying Donkey Kong Bananza isn’t innovative just doesn’t line up with reality. And saying that Nintendo as a whole isn’t innovative is just ridiculous.