cross-posted to: https://sh.itjust.works/post/12856689


I have the following topology:

The device running Nextcloud (snap) used to be connected to Router A, but I have recently added a bridge (Router B) and I moved Nextcloud’s device to that bridged network; however, as soon as Nextcloud was moved to Router B, the portforward on Router A seemed to stop working – as in I cannot connect to nexcloud from the public IP anymore. Bridges operate at layer 2, so this should make no difference whatsoever (this is reflected in the fact that other services (like SSH) still work perfectly fine portforwarded – it’s only Nextcloud that doesn’t work), which leads me to think that it is a Layer 7 (i.e. Nextcloud) issue. What’s going on here? How can Nextcloud even tell that it’s been placed on a bridged network?

EDIT (2024-01-16T00:19Z):

I performed a network capture on the device running Nextcloud, and it appears that it’s receiving the incoming request (SYN), and responds appropriately (SYN, ACK), but then Router B responds with Destination unreachable (Network unreachable), which is then, of course, followed by many requests for retransmission as the packets are being dropped. But what’s causing the packets to be dropped? Why aren’t they making it through the network?

EDIT (2024-01-25T08:37Z):

I’m not 100% sure what the previous problem was, but I think that it had to do with the bridge that I was using – not necessarily that it was broken, but perhaps it was jsut incompatible with the setup in some way. What I ended up doing was buying a different router that supported WDS, and then I created a WDS bridge between the two routers. The network seems to be working reliably, and as expected now.

  • deadbeef@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Your bridge isn’t bridging properly. If Router B is sending a destination unreachable then the packets are being handled on it further up the stack at layer 3 by some sort of routing component rather than by a layer 2 bridging one.

    • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Indeed it is not. Do you, by chance, have any suggestions – troubleshooting, alternatives, etc.?

      • vegetaaaaaaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        run ip route and ip route get $CLIENT_PUBLIC_IP on router B and see if it has a route to the client, and/or if the default route is correct. Its default gateway might not be set correctly (it should be router A)

        and responds appropriately (SYN, ACK),

        Does it respond to the client address (public IP?)

        • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m not exactly sure what the previous issue was, but it appears that, possibly, the previous bridge that was in use was broken in some way. I have since switched the primary router to one that supports WDS, and created a WDS bridge between the two, and now everything is working as expected.