• CoderKat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Agreed. I don’t see the point in trying to ban something before it exists and before we even know anything about how it would work. I get it, Meta has done some shit. But on the other hand, having such a big player in the Fediverse could be huge for its growth, especially since the Fediverse has a serious UX issue and UX is Meta’s strength.

    I don’t really understand the privacy concerns. Just don’t use their instances? Have y’all seen how the Fediverse already works? Stuff like your votes are already public and that can’t be easily changed. And a nifty thing is that if Meta makes a product for the Fediverse that is federated, it’s just as easy for its users to migrate to another Fediverse platform if we find out Meta pulls some shit.

    • QHC@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      The whole point of the Fediverse is to add a human-based trust component. Why would a company that has repeatedly shown itself to not be trustworthy get the benefit of the doubt?

      IMO, Meta can start their own instance and ask to be invited to the larger system, assuming they first prove to be worth taking that risk.