Wrong community then. Go to the console or sony community please if you can’t reason.

Confirmed =/= released

Yeah nope. I won’t touch Ubisoft anymore after they removed my license from The Crew after I reported them to the french consumer protection regarding stopkillinggames

I like the [Max Quality] option. Much fancy, very wow.

Moat likely.

Depends.
If you connect to the MyFritz proxy service (https://sso.myfritz.net/) from AVM, then no
If you access your own myfritz adress, then yes. (https://example123987wpvor.myfritz.net:12345)

But the only thing the myfritz page from AVM does is enable you to access some functions from the fritzbox like smart home stuff, your internet connection (type of connection, public IP, etc.)

This so much of a lie.
Only the usual suspects (new fiber ISPs, Vodafone/KabelBW and O₂) do and usually on the coax and fiber contracts.

Wireguard will only work if the cellular or ISP at, say the workplace, have an IPv6 adress or IPv4-to-6 translation

*CG-NAT

The myfritz can communicate with the fritzbox but trying to connect directly (as it’s not proxied) from IPv4 only will fail as well.

You checked if you have a DS-Lite contract? Those are very popular. Especially with O2, Vodafone and the fiber ISPs.
The problem: You get only an IPv4 CG-NAT IP and a regular IPv6 IP. If your ISP (for example at work) did not configure an IPv6, you will not be able to connect (A and AAAA DNS records).
I assume you set up the port forwarding in your Fritzbox (under Internet > Freigaben > Portfreigaben)?
If it has the proper external port connected to your internal port it should connect.

Sufficiently qualifiedd to be working in IT.

Also a happy user of HortusFox. Very good service :)

5.4k + smr would explain it at write but not at read.

Remember the flamethrower? This thing looked like actual fun. Even the name was/is hilarious

Wrong thread?

But now you need to run 2 pcs instead of just one.

Are you ignoring what I wrote earlier in the same thread?

Probably only on a targeted attack. I don’t see it being a mass target attack like a worm could be. And in the realm of businesses, how many programs are running in kernel level besides the antivirus/ED(P)R solution?

Anyway. Counter question: Why do you think gamers appear as a more valuable target with the anti cheat as a possible attack vector vs a business running literally the same CPU line-up but with fewer kernel level programs?

My personal opinion: You can’t extract as much money from private folks vs a business through blackmail and other solutions. Not in a wide casted attack.
Targeted individuals can be assumed to be at a higher risk (e.g. hacking their private devices like the gaming pc and then doing home office work in the same network, or misusing trust in the home network between pc and phone and then installing malware like pegasus).
But again: Not in a wide casted net. And you are probably better of using the good exploits for higher value targets.

And at best reroute the traffic before going outside

Again: Mass spread vs target attack.
Remember WannaCry? Yeah, I don’t see that happen.
But (industrial) e-spionage on the other hand? Yup. Will happen 100%