All posts/comments by me are licensed by CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, unless otherwise noted.
Signatures in Lemmy comments are spam.
Like putting your sexual kinks in a email signature
Touch grass. Really.
Being little spam doesn’t make it cool. Being little spam about your copyleft views doesn’t make it cool.
I would argue that ignorance tends to benefit corporations moreso than regular people without power. Take avail of any power that you have available to you, before its all gone.
Also, if you don’t defend others views, then one day, your views will not be defended.
Would be nice if it could be set as some kind of post / comment metadata, hidden from view but there in the code.
I’d love that, if it would be legally respected by corporations/scrapers. I even mention my license intention for my content in my bio here on Lemmy as well. It would save me allot of hassle arguing with others as well.
Until then, I have to embed the license in the content itself, especially while the new AI law is just starting to sort out these issues.
Like putting your sexual kinks in a email signature or telling everyone who didn’t ask that you’re vegan.
(quoting another person, not the one I’m directly replying to)
But honestly people, if you are being bothered by a simple link in a comment, that is allowed on Lemmy, then you really need to look within. If your client of choice is not displaying subscripted fonts correctly, and hence the text/link looks worse than it should, then you really need to speak with the devs of the client about that (as I mentioned in my ‘FAQ’ link, I’m using official Lemmy.World formatting). And if you don’t like seeing a license in general, then I can’t help you with that one, except for maybe giving some ‘touch grass’ advice (especially to the person I quoted above).
BOOO stupid long copyright signatures!
Some info about that …
Potential great news, but need to see more than just the CEO saying this.
Looking forward to the Gamers Nexus (or Hardware Umboxed, etc.) review on the chip/products.
From the article …
In a conference call, Ubisoft chief financial officer Frederick Duguet said the subsidiary’s board “will be controlled by Ubisoft, so Ubisoft will continue controlling and consolidating this entity.”
From the article …
08:47 Impossible? Wake on Bluetooth w/ the LCD Deck
Was quick browsing for openwrt and found the banana pi r3.
One thing that surprised me when I was looking to upgrade my old router ith OpenWRT is if a firmware for your router supports ALL of the features/hardware of that router. In my case, Wifi support was not supported, so I had to disregard using OpenWRT as a choice.
So be sure to look carefully at the firmware that you find. I personally had just thought that if a firmware exists for your hardware that all of the major (but maybe not minor) features would be supported, and that is not always the case.
From the article, the reason for the closure is the upcoming Online Safety Act.
Okay I read that Wikipedia article and I absolutely no idea what point you’re trying to make.
Did you read the first paragraph in the “Etymology” section?
You are arguing in favor of technofeudalism.
No, I’m not, at all.
I’m arguing against prejudice, and for starting NOW to play how real AI will be used in our future society.
Personally, I believe in unions, I’m not looking to replace humans. But I sure as hell know that CORPORATIONS are looking to replace humans (and increase their profits).
So just trying to “stiffarm” pre-AI today via prejudice is not going to cut it. And that’s what I see people trying to do, its irrational and unproductive. “Sticking your heads in the ground” never works.
I have yet to see any evidence that we are in any way progressing towards that world.
You haven’t been an observer of humanity then. They have quite a track record (see “Etymology”) of how they interact with new technologies and new ways of being.
Well to be fair, i don’t like art made by humans that are assholes either.
🤔 Fair enough, I’ll allow it. lol! 🙂
Though i dont agree that ai is inherently equal to those human assholes. Especially since for most of the important use cases (ie not spamming ai slop all over galleries online), an artist is usually the one influencing the ai tools, not the other way around.
Actually I’d agree with this. Right now we’re in the infancy of “AI” (note the quotes). I was speaking towards a future when true AI has been created, and the artist is the tool as well, and those AI beings start creating art on their own. Would decades/generations of anti-“AI” prejudice make it a hard climb for real AI to have their art seen as just art, and not a fake human “AI” creation.
I’m not talking about sentience per se, but how any “AI” would think, lookups (LLMs), vs synthesized on-the-fly thinking (mimicing the human brain’s procesing).
You all suggesting that in the future AI will have feelings and emotions and will care that people are prejudiced against it.
No, not at all. I’m saying that future AI will not just be dumb LLMs, they’ll be more like functional code that can literally think for itself. That it will be able to create and learn (like humans do) to do jobs, and do those jobs well. Robots with brains, etc., like you see in the movies.
I did mention previously about “in the future”, some day, not today. LLMs are not AI, at least the kind of AI that I’m talking about.
But even taking your point, do we let a human always keep a job that an AI can do much for efficiently? What job protections should humans have from AIs? And for that matter, what job protections should humans have today, right now, regardless of AI? (For the record, I support Unions.)
We all need to figure this out, right now, as corporations are salavating at the though of an AI that can replace a human being’s job.
Your comment seems loaded with purposefully inflammatory language
Pointing out that someone justifies if they like something or not by who made it, vs by judging the item being made itself, is inflammatory?
as a trans person, it makes you look like a real silly goose.
I remember back in the 80’s where people were hating on a Top 40 song because it was made by a group who’s singer was gay, and thought that was very wrong, that the song itself should be judged on its own merits, and not by who was singing it.
Weird how those lessons learned fade away, needing to be learned again.
I like human created art because it’s created by humans. If AI generated the greatest song, image, or video game i would not care—i don’t want it.
Your opinion seems prejudicial, focusing on the creator of the art, and not the art itself.
Idgaf if ai exists I just don’t want it replacing people without warning where people are way better for the job
Agreed. We’re going to need laws for that though, and right now Congress only listens to Corporations, and Corporations want AI to get rid of those pesky workers that drain away their profits.
But also, you gotta understand that at some point, for some things, AI will be better than humans for particular jobs. When that happens, what then? Force-keep the human on the job, or retrain them, or just tell them “sucks to be you have a nice day” and show them the door, or something else???
This is really the beginning of a monumental time for the species, as big as the introduction of the Internet was. Better start figuring this shit out now, instead of (metaphorically) just covering our ears and yelling “LA! LA! LA! LA! LA! I CAN’T HEAR YOU!” trying to ignore the whole thing.
I wouldn’t disagree with that. Today’s reality is that you need a job to obtain a QoL (aka ‘pay the bills’). If we could get to a place as a species to where three/four day work weeks were the norm, that would be fine by me.
I’m assuming that at some point in our species future we’ll be in a Post-scarcity place, and jobs as we know them now won’t be needed. Instead people will have ‘hobbies’ that they enjoy doing. That’s assuming the Morlocks don’t eat all the Eloi before the Post-scarcity occurs, that is.
Feel free to block me.
This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0