I’m gonna vote for the Kirby’s Return to Dreamland remake. It’s playable in single player, but it was built with one-screen co-op in mind.
I want to be involved but my PC is dying! 😭
I’m gonna vote for the Kirby’s Return to Dreamland remake. It’s playable in single player, but it was built with one-screen co-op in mind.
I just wish humans could be not awful for once in our history. You know what I’ve done with ChatGPT? I had it help me convert a big python function into a one-line delta, and got it to write a short horror story about a man eating a can of beans in theater, amongst other silly things. But everyone suffers, and things get harder to make use of because of power-mad scumbags who see everything as a means to gain control of others.
I’ve been doing a lot of reading about DDG since this dropped and ad blocking, a major privacy factor, was not included, and simply, I don’t trust DDG anymore. If they were willing to disregard user privacy once, chances are they’ll do it again. Hell, I’d bet they already are.
I watched that video around when it first came out, really interesting stuff.
I know what you mean, I stopped doing giveaways on SteamGifts because I started having users not mark the games as received, which negatively impacted me directly, and even caught one reselling a game I’d given them.
Lemmit.online is using Reddit’s rss feeds to share the posts to the fediverse. Worth giving a look.
Thanks, but honestly, I’m just not that lucky. You should’ve seen my SteamGifts ratio back when I was on the site.
Ah well, thanks for this anyway.
I managed to get it for super cheap so the cost was never really an issue, but it didn’t really grab me. The biggest thing that put me off was the heavy focus on building in the early game. The community was really great at the time, though.
IMO, physical ability to do so should be the only cutoff. No one should have to stop doing something they love just because society deems them too old.
I understand your why, but in the end, I think defederation is probably going to do more harm than good. Lemmy.world and beehaw are both large instances, and for a whole group on one, a non-negligible amount of content just disappeared. Sure, they could just make new accounts somewhere else, but there’s no way all of them will. For those that won’t, the whole of Lemmy just got a lot less valuable.
I think that ultimately, large amounts of defederation, or just large instances defederation each other, is going to harm Lemmy and the fediverse as a whole. More people might migrate to smaller instances. Some will collapse under the strain, some might become big, follow the cycle and sew more division within the fediverse. A lot of people will get tired of juggling accounts and return to more toxic, but easier, centralized alternatives.
Of course, just not defederating anything isn’t a solution either. Well, I mean, it is in a technical sense, but it doesn’t get to the root of the issue. My best idea would be some solution that allows users of certain instances to still see content and subscribe to communities, but limit their ability to interact. Think something like sliding defederation. Admins would be able to set what users of specific instances can and can’t do, from voting, commenting, submitting down to total defederation for the most extreme cases.
Of course, the best code I’ve managed myself is a semi-functional python module, so…
Hey, good luck to everyone, and super big kudos to OP_Not_Found
for doing this!
Uh, let’s go with Yuppie Psycho.
I’ve always enjoyed roguelikes but never really been able to spend a lot of time with a single one until Risk of Rain. It’s my absolute go-to.
Only problem really is storage. High quality video can fill a hard drive pretty quick.