that makes sense. Thank you.
that makes sense. Thank you.
No negatives listed on the Wiki page. Are there any? Does potting increase the likely hood of overheating?
The French government said that Telegram is being used to distribute illegal material like child pornography. He is not accused of distributing it himself.
IBM was the biggest help to Microsoft and gave them that revolutionary contract.
Good thing Bill’s mommy was on the board to make sure everything runs smoothly.
deleted by creator
Even if the writer signed off on this, this should be illegal.
Actually make every AI generated poop have to list their sources. Corps wanted strong copyright laws, here it is.
if (user.prop.epilepsy.photosensitivity == True) {
...
}
This is a follow up to an article written by Platformer.
Lemmy Links here:
Lets put name to the IP address. Yup, that is the same as just the IP address that can be shared by multiple devices.
Imagine parents actually parenting instead of blaming everyone else but themselves?
Also the “Think about the children!” states but force birth on minors, don’t give healthcare or food to kids, and vote in pedophiles.
Stanford University has made hundreds of millions of dollars on licensing alone. That doesn’t even include the billions they got from donations.
They can afford to fight this. What they do get just giving up is the donations they get from conservatives. This is a business decision.
If we hit these AI companies with targeted suing, like how Scientology got their way with the IRS, maybe we then they can listen to not steal our shit.
The MPAA and RIAA have created all these laws and used our own government againat us. Maybe we can use these same laws and do the same.
Thanks for the info. The Accessible name calculation page is really interesting.
I looked through the beehaw instance and I saw what you had screenshot. You are right. It is not your browser, it is the instance.
Currently they currently on 0.18.4. Infosec.pub is currently on 0.19.3. Maybe that’s the issue…
https://www.boia.org/blog/should-you-include-alt-text-for-pictures-with-captions
I think their might be something wrong with your browser or something. I tried the code blocks using spaces, tabs, and backticks, and I didn’t have the img
problem you had.
I also checked from a different account on a different instance on a different browser this post and I can see the link.
I put a link after the quote. That’s the source.
Yes you can use both but I’ve seen some front end developers blank out alt
altogether when they are using figcaption
.
I did not find this practice in MDN Web Docs but I found it in an other place:
If you’re using an image that has a caption, it may not need alt text if the caption contains all of the relevant visual information.
I was just wondering what Mozilla’s method was for finding these images and if they took other things in to consideration like decorative images.
Moon Readers cloud sync is amazing if you read from multiple devices. I think they recently added book syncing too.