Nvidia hasn’t really fallen yet. Across six months it’s pretty flat. Nothing like Microsoft or Amazon which have significant dips.

Then it seems like a strategic move alongside locking higher playback speeds behind premium as well.

UI and player control on payed tiers when it makes no technical difference to them as a delivery platform.

“In this video game, despite the random allocation of individual digital content from the Packs, the human player can use their own skills to control the course of the game with a probability suitable for success, thus establishing a rational expectation of winning,” the court concluded.

Apparently it’s not about the loot box itself but that what you get out of it is used in a game that involves skill.

deleted by creator

14 days is not a long time between announcement and removal. This press article picked up on it even later/shorter. (Predictably. It takes time for the info to spread.)

If these are the models most damaging to vulnerable people their deactivation seems like a good thing though.

The free chatgpt switches to mini after x prompts in a conversation. What will it switch to now?

They leave me, just like in real life :( /s

We are on Lemmy though. It’s certainly relevant to me.

I don’t need it to be a popular app for others when is not for me.

The complaint cites “whistleblowers” as having helped bring this information to light, though it doesn’t explain who they are.

No substance yet.

When the pig has a public platform it can be important to respond. Not for the other, but for the audience or community. Otherwise, public discourse becomes dominated by pigs.

(Staying in your analogy. I think pigs are better than that.)

Could you link a or the source?

The post links an image, and the description links a page with a login screen.

Dark humor is a coping mechanism. Venting elsewhere doesn’t tell us anything about their communication style.

I don’t see anything that would warrant blaming her here.

This is literally how all of law, terms, regulations, and moderation work. The collective or defining party defines a set of rules.

The rules obviously don’t prevent lying or ignoring the rules, but they set the baseline to moderate and act with. Without the rule, Bandcamp would not remove such content, and people could not reclaim their money, and nobody could sue the publishers.

The other problem is that music you bought can disappear from your Bandcamp library.

I wasn’t aware of this for quite a while. But the artist can remove the titles and they disappear. Do much for buying, library, owning, and downloading. Better make sure to download and back up.

I don’t have any experience or specific knowledge about it, but I suspect these things may have significant variance between countries or even cities.

Really unfortunate and sad either way.

You mean my second point does? Would you agree with, do you see my first point being independent of the process and act of such a creation?

The same applies to the creation or training process. If they trained with voice samples or have a collection of voice samples for matching, then those could serve as evidence or indications.

If you’re selling or publishing a voice in a way that impersonates another person without their consent that may be identifiable and prosecutable. “Generate with x voice.” 'Talk to x." Etc. Exact lettering is no necessary if intent is evident from pictures or evasive descriptions making an obvious implication.

If prosecution can find evidence of cloning/training that can also serve as basis.

In these ways it doesn’t have to be about similarity of the produced voice, of quality or alternative people, at all.

End to end - just like the food through your body 😏

It’s definitely been a thing before Trump. A lot of corporate and publicity speak is like this. Trump is certainly the most prominent, visible, and ‘obvious through exposure’ figure and example of this right now though.

Biological and psychological variance is an Internet part of humanity. When you say this I’m immediately reminded of fascist ideals and efforts to ‘normalize’ and ‘conformize’ people, and not just from this side of the spectrum. So I think this is a somewhat dangerous argument to make.

At large, it’s human nature to elevate these kinds of people, that’s why they end up in such high positions. I’m not sure we can change that. And that’s where regulations and requirements by law come in, as well as public record and press, to keep them in check.

I get the sentiment and frustration in your comment though.

Part of this service is covering the risk of unforseen cost. Heating breaks? That may become expensive. You pay a monthly fee and don’t have to manage risk and cost like that. Many people would be ruined if they had to cover that and repair becomes necessary, or face worsening condition.