Essentially you need a load balancer hosted somewhere that the traffic hits before getting routed to one of the 2 servers. That could be a VPS running Traefik if you prefer that.
Alternatively you could both run something like IPFS and run the static site on that, but anyone accessing the site would either need IPFS installed, or use a gateway hosted somewhere (Cloudflare has a public for example).
It’s kind of depressing how fragmented the Matrix ecosystem is, a bunch of clients but none seem to support everything together, servers that are slow and bloated, and don’t support super basic maintenance tasks like cleaning up old stuff, etc…
Yeah some people would do that.
An AFK kick seems simple enough to stop most of those situations.
It can be anything you want.
How you change it depends on the specific server you’re using, I use SFTPGo for a webdav server and when I create a new user it just asks where the data should go.
Software RAID is generally better in every way, also no hardware to fail.
Keep multiple reliable (and tested) backups, if something fails restore a backup.
Don’t rely on any storage, RAID or anything else to be recoverable when something goes wrong.
Backrest is also great, just a nice webUI for Restic.
FolderSync is a good alternative, more battery friendly too!
Cheating, every lobby has several of them and you’ll play for a few minutes only to be teleported somewhere and killed, or run into a guy with god mode turned on.
To be fair running a company you would likely want to focus on the people that give you money, not the group that complains and doesn’t.
I’d take a guess that from their perspective, putting that time + money into developing and supporting a Linux version isn’t worth it when probably ~3% of the user base is using it.
Outgoing should already allow everything, so no need to specifically allow it.
Make sure you’re creating a block rule specifically on outgoing in that case.
Is wireguard incoming or outgoing from the machine you’re trying to block it on?
Do you have something listening on port 52038 that will respond to a port scan? If not it will report as closed.
Annoying that it doesn’t give more details!
I think you might need to add your site to google search console to see more details on specifically why it was listed as unsafe.
Some info here: https://web.dev/articles/use-search-console
Probably due to their status as a privacy friendly way to have a domain they get a lot more fraud and scams using their services, they’re probably dealing with tons of this stuff daily. Being flagged by google safe browsing most of the time means something isn’t right, but I’m not sure what they would really be able to investigate on their end.
Have you figured out why you were flagged? I’ve seen similar stuff from self hosters before where they have a compromised service exposed to the internet and didn’t realize it.
Does it transcode the uploads for better remote viewing like Peertube does? I can’t tell from the github page. This looks a lot simpler to run than peertube since all I really do is share clips with friends.
I don’t think sharing 100Mbps+ 3440x1440 files from shadowplay is going to go well when sharing to friends that have more limited internet speeds.
Why so angry?
This lets you share photos without directly exposing Immich to the internet.
I don’t see the point in getting so worked up over someones project they made and decided to share, it’s not like you’re being forced to use it.