I was curious about how much you could actually read in the 11 minutes that this YouTube drivel wasted on getting a point across
I tested my reading speed and it was 346 wpm, so I’m guessing the average is about 300 because I read a lot
3300 words is an absolute fuckton of information.
I’ve no idea why anyone would waste 11 minutes listening to about two minutes worth of information
Yes, we know
We’ve come full circle
These are the people who leave a 1-star review for a quality, handmade item because their delivery driver put it in the wrong place
That was a 13 minute video
I read your title in two seconds
They contained roughly the same amount of info
Really, really reads like it
It’s a joke on the mess that Reagan made of the education system, chill out
What, like your education system is so bad you can’t even spell the names of your presidents? 😂
We shouldn’t have, never of
Could you just fuckin tell us instead of posting a vid?
I can assure you if you were watching a programme that was hyping nfts, you weren’t watching “news”
WTF is up with your media over there?!?
Have you thought about Eurocylinders? Basically you can buy any door furniture you want, and fit your lock after. You can now get smart Eurocylinders to fit
People started using it to promote their YouTube channels
I’d rather poke my eye out with a frozen dogshit than click on a YouTube link with a thumbnail like that
testing their internet download limits
Sorry, it’s not 2005, who has download limits any more 😂
Probably made by FIAT
The author also used the phrase “least buggiest” in the headline, I think we can guarantee there isn’t any actual journalism in the article
Read all through that article, then all through the comments, to find a donation link. There wasn’t one so link for the lazy - https://archive.org/donate/
Imdoingmypart.jpeg
deleted by creator