Need more capacity for all the liberal tears?

Most open source projects rely on volunteers, and few technical writers volunteer.

Privacy is part of the reason I got back into film photography, my photos can’t be spied on if they never touch a computer.

Honestly surprised, i thought blu-ray m-disc was moderately popular

Seems to just be hosting issues https://www.reddit.com/r/Funkwhale/comments/1dlrsqn/funkwhaleaudio_down/

Funkwhale?

Mozilla is notoriously pro censorship, they blocked dissenter a while ago.

Yeah, after that I’m not really interested in what the grifter thinks.

I’m surprised it lasted this long. It was always kinda just a marketing gimmick for broadcom that got out of hand.

Apple puts a DRM chip in their peripherals, the fault for this happening is mostly on them.

I don’t see how that makes sense as a statement, an ai with access to a 56k modem can send a fax. It feels like they’re just using ai as a buzzword.

I’ve long thought that if politicians want to see our whatsapp messages, all politicians’ whatsapp messages should be published publicly.

How is he controversial? the only negative thing I’ve seen about FUTO is the proprietary license grayjay is under.

the large ecosystem of commercial crap which has tainted by association the open source core of it

Isn’t the main shop plugin (woocommerce) heavily infested with that though?

Did this get federated into !lemmy@lemmy.ml from mastodon just because of the @lemmy tag?

That’s pretty cool.

It’s a hookup app, I think it’s optional (I don’t use it myself), but most people are going to want to know that.

Lemmy default UI is worst. It doesn’t even show the link. You have to click it’s title to see the video but it’s visually not a link.

If you click the thumbnail (or the arrow where the thumbnail normally is) it in-lines the video. So it works, it’s just not the most intuitive behaviour.

but set them to pull such numbers in for each post/comment mirrored from another instance.

I think the asynchronous way lemmy handles creating a comment/post and then sending it would make this difficult.

If you’re proposing overhauling the whole architecture of lemmy to use consistent UUID-based IDs for comments, posts, etc. across all instances, that could probably work but there are some edge cases especially with malicious actors, and it would be a huge undertaking.

That was what I was suggesting yeah, version 3-5 look like it could work, you could use the originating server as the name-space, and a local server generated ID for the name. As long as they only use information sent elsewhere the hashes should be reproducible, so you can check that a server is only using it’s own name to send new comments/posts, which should protect against the obvious attacks.

The more I think about it I’m not sure you would even need to use an official UUID system actually, just make something like <originating server>-<id from origin server> as the unique ID?

I agree it would be a big change to make though, especially dealing with all the existing posts.

UUIDs?