Okidoke, hope you are getting what you want and need out of life fully consensually and everyone else are getting their needs and wants met too.

As for me, I’ll keep not existing in both the streets and the sheets.

To answer the question in the brackets, it’s not about being attracted to sex itself or not, it’s about not being attracted to someone sexually (as in not finding a person sexually attractive). But sex can still be interesting and/or enjoyable to someone for various reasons besides being attracted to someone.

No, I corrected my post with more detail, hope you can see the edit.

Anyway, no people can be interested in sex for other reasons like enjoying the physical sensations etc, just because someone isn’t sexually attracted to someone doesn’t mean they aren’t interested in the act itself.

Asexuality is about not experiencing sexual attraction, not about being interested in sex or not.

Some asexuals are also not interested in sex: Sex Repulsed

Some don’t care: Sex indifferent

Some want it: Sex favourable

Of course, then there is the spectrum including Grey Aces: Sometimes feel sexual attraction under certain circumstances, and Demisexuals who are only sexually attracted when they have a strong emotional connection to someone.

There are other labels under the asexual-spectrum but those are the most well known.

Yes! I loved it, and same about tears.

Ooo, interesting.

Thank you, looking forward to it!

Guess I don’t exist as I don’t play either.

That’s not what asexual means.

I can’t help but feel that part of this is because to make a movie there’s a higher barrier to entry and so a lot of studios and big budget production companies keep doing the ‘safe’ thing and regurgitating already existing properties or keeping their storylines ‘safe’.

This happens in gaming too (especially with big budget franchises) but there are really great experiments and indies out there showing what can be done, which is less so in the movie and TV industry.

People don’t always want the same thing over and over again and if executives could ever learn this it would be amazing how much creativity there would be, but they don’t.

Hehe

Betteridge’s law of headlines.

So no.

Noooo, don’t do it Tony. Activision are awful!

Good for them.

Hope companies start learning they can’t treat people like that and keep people in the field, instead they’ll go out to one.

Well, the web shouldn’t be human. But if they were to attempt to make it then LLMs would not be the way.

Sure, I get your point and agree.

I just think that third party middleman attacks should be mitigated wherever possible and so far, in looking at online therapy I’ve never seen one that can back up their claims of being private with data, just vague references to how secure it is.

It’s a tricky situation, and I guess there’s no good solution because either we have to trust the third party or just the therapist and if neither can be trusted, well…

it just speaks to a larger issue with society as a whole, how we treat mental health and especially that we need to pay in order to deal with our issues, and that it hasn’t been understood yet that it’s shameful and scary to come forward about problems because of certain laws, and the possibility of either the original scenario or the one you proposed.

This is terrible. However it’s one reason online ‘therapy’ should never be trusted to be private.

Unless the therapists start using actually private ways of communicating like Signal, then stuff like this will keep happening.

Yep, that’s why mastodon only allows for 72 characters maximum in passwords, I assume.

https://immich.app/cursed-knowledge

Thank you

Yeah, I was pleasantly surprised. I love learning things about indigenous cultures.