Note to studios: there is no amount of potential, unrealised profit that makes it ethical to install malware on another person’s computer.
Note to studios: there is no amount of potential, unrealised profit that makes it ethical to install malware on another person’s computer.
Did you… try?
I can’t help you but I’m fascinated by your door now. Does this door/lock have a name? How did you end up with such an elaborate mechanism?
I’ve used 3 unrelated baby cams and junked them all because not one was remotely usable, never mind reliable.
That was a decade ago, but we had pretty solid ip cameras a decade ago.
It’s amazing to watch the old, rusted machine of antitrust slowly grinding back to life, bit by bit.
That’s a completely different statement
If anyone is considering how to avoid this on their own site: https://indieweb.org/URL_design
Avoiding spyware doesn’t mean you’re opposed to labor-saving technology
They confined their attacks to manufacturers who used machines in what they called “a fraudulent and deceitful manner” to get around standard labor practices. “They just wanted machines that made high-quality goods,” says Binfield, “and they wanted these machines to be run by workers who had gone through an apprenticeship and got paid decent wages. Those were their only concerns.”
It’s not clear from your post whether you’ve read the article. In case you haven’t, it’s not really about printers.
I appreciate the ambiguity in your comment created by the missing pronoun.
Who could have ever guessed that naming different software the same thing would ever come back to bite them
Will we ever stop referring to the Web as “the Internet”?
Props for finally doing it, but a modding API was promised more than 10 years ago!
The SDA is infamous for fighting against the interests of workers under its umbrella.
Blinx: The time sweeper
Thanks for bringing that up, I played the shit out of Blinx 2 back when and had all but forgotten it.
Incidentally my first thought reading your comment was “Prince of Persia: Sands of Time”