Well, then they should shut up about half-life until they’ve played all the half-life already released.

and most people don’t realise how it ended, but keep bitching about hl3

I don’t want the OLED version. But I do want the limited edition OLED version. Please bring it to the UK!

POINPY is a fantastic Netflix owned mobile game.

Don’t just downvote because ‘Netflix bad, not for gamers’. Go play it, you can just log in with netflix and get a great game.

I don’t even own the game yet but after watching one gameplay video, i looked to see if there’s a mod to speed up the airlock doors. Thankfully yes.

Looks like theme park world

Or just play openrct2 and relive the joy again.

wtf has Starfield got to do with anything?

They both were received badly. Because they were both disappointing.

What are you talking about. It had a bad rating because it was received badly, what stats show that everyone loved it 😂

I’m talking about the world on the whole, because unfortunately I got bored and was so disappointed in the offerings that I probably didn’t play the missions you mentioned, and dropped it out of my to-play list, as other games have been more engaging.

Saying something wasn’t broken when it was, is whitewashing.

The statistics are that the majority of people were disappointed in the release.

Again, no it wasn’t perfectly fine. Of course, I had it on an M2 drive. No amount of whitewashing can cover up the fact it was broken and unfinished on launch, and that’s why there was such a well deserved backlash.

They promised things that simply weren’t in the game. There were clear unfinished parts of the world, the story, and the gameplay.

Starfield is Skyrim in space. If you like that formula, great, you got Skyrim in space.

It was not the only true sin of cyberpunk. I played on release on a 3090 and it was bland, felt rushed, full of bugs, and the city felt hollow with things spawning in and out breaking immersion. It just wasn’t a fun game unless you stuck to the rails, and even then it felt half-assed. The intro where I’m rushed into the city and then they just skip over all the character introductions with a cutscene really left a sour taste in my mouth.

They hyped it up to be this living breathing city with ultimate freedom and they simply didn’t deliver.

Starfield, however, everyone knew they were using the same old engine, with the same old game design, it was just going to be Skyrim in space. And it was.

Almost as if they spent 163 million dollars on marketing. That’s why there’s so much astroturfing and constant press releases. They’re paying big money to turn the reputation around.

“gamign”, said the gaming journalist

It sounds great from your description and it looks fantastic with a really nice aesthetic. Why do you think people disliked it?

This game was great

I mean, yeah, that’s literally how the story went, V was new to the city and had never been there before.

Yes, most games, films, books, with a story do introduce you to the characters.

Ah not liking something makes me the bad guy because apparently it’s my whole personality.

Nope. Just talking about something in the thread where there’s a discussion about it. Happens to be I agree with many others that it was an overhead disappointment propped up by marketing money.

Fair point about starfield, I haven’t played it yet but have heard many negative things.

But your point about cyberpunk, in response to me is “It was too buggy to enjoy on release and I haven’t played the late, updated version” , but you’re glad it’s being marketed on every platform?

That doesn’t do it any favours 😅