This site has an archive of all the NYT Connections games:

https://connections.swellgarfo.com/archive

I was joking. Don’t do this.

I managed to get in and change mine last night. So you just have to keep hammering that refresh button until you overcome whoever this asshole is that’s DOSing the site. Maybe even do it on several computers, and write a script to help.

Edit: Joke, don’t do.

This article is from 2018.

Many of our home customers’ feedback indicated a preference for the certainty provided by an annual plan. The annual plan offers assurance that you always have access to the latest version with innovations such as improvements we’ve made in compression speeds and algorithms. It also ensures you have access to critical updates and are protected against new threats and risks.

I think they made that up. I highly doubt their customers expressed any such preference.

$20 per month would be enough to discourage me. It’s another relatively costly computer-related subscription and I already feel like I’m losing a battle to keep those minimal. There would have to be some very clear benefits for that price.

But it’s glitchy, the numbers don’t work, and you’ll notice the player never looks behind them.

I watched the video and there are two scenes where the player turns to look directly back where they just came from.

Every company is still doing this even though studies have shown it puts customers off.

https://www.techradar.com/pro/ai-a-turn-off-tech-customers-are-apparently-already-getting-bored-of-smart-devices-and-it-could-be-hitting-sales

If it works like most AI ad engines, it will keep advertising more of the same Ford car you just bought.

As I understand it, that project spanned several planned generations of chips and this was to be the first of them. So yes, this is part of the cancellation of his whole project.

It’s wise to wait and see, given their recent history.

They’re looking for something open-source. Draw.io’s readme says:

License

The source code authored by us in this repo is licensed under a modified Apache v2 license. This project is not an open source project as a result.

I haven’t been through the license to see what its restrictions are, but there must be a reason they give this warning.

At the bottom of the article there’s a tapestry of an NVIDIA graphics chip created on a computer-controlled loom.

You and everyone else. I’d have to see a few problem-free years from Intel before I’d return to them.

Or Amazon’t.

And personalized pricing, based on your profile and what they think they can get you to pay.

Maybe they should, and also care about the many people still using these processors that are not very old.

It keeps promising to, then goes off into more ChatGPT-style rambling. It’s a bad article. This one is more informative:

https://www.oligo.security/blog/0-0-0-0-day-exploiting-localhost-apis-from-the-browser

It’s the professional software that keeps people off Linux. Particularly software for art, video and music. Not enough of it has Linux versions or Windows versions that run well enough in Linux. And a lot of people are forced to use Windows for work because that’s their company’s standard and they use all kinds of Windows-specific software.

How can that be? It’s the same machine except you have introduced some overhead.