The big issue to me is that the pricing of digital items is completely unrelated to the cost of creation. And it targets children who don’t know better.

I find this pro evil approach refreshing

Fuck tiktok

wtf you on about? you jumped in on a conversation with insults and idiocy. You have issues.

Shoo

You’re offensive.

Lol you talk as if I give a fuck

Wow I bet you’re fun at parties

It’s not a litmus test, it’s just a basic filter. You don’t understand the time wasted (for both parties) when recruiters present “self starters” and “driven” and “passionate” candidates. It’s not our goal to give people a chance, it’s our goal to find a great fit for the position.

I do a lot of dev interviews. We do require a BS in computer science… it’s just a good way of filtering out the hordes of terrible candidates. Beyond that, the most important thing we look for is honest representations on the resume, and the ability to clearly show competency in the required areas. Ramblers, people who make shit up and can’t say “I don’t know” are filtered out quick. We do a 1hr tech screen, after which I make a recommendation and if good, the candidate is brought in for a second interview that is pretty much a formality.

I wonder how many bots get offers

Frungee! Frungee! Frungee!

It sucks. I never tried Payday games, so I tried Payday 3… it was so janky I doubt I’m ever going back.

I heard they’re doing a 180 on the 360

That’s a bold move, Cotton

Lol I’m more worried about the Oracle tax tbh

I never played this series, but I do remember him being a self promoting prick on the game channels, wearing some huge gold chain. He’s got the whiff of a loser from lawbreakers, and I can see why MS doesn’t want to put this wrench in the gears…

See what I did there

This is actually an excellent way to trigger faster regulation of fakes. I applaud this.

God I hope we don’t go through a phase of crappy games designed and developed using AI.

deleted by creator