• nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I want games to have labels that they use AI generated assets. So I can avoid them.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      AI is fine if it’s used in the beginning-middle of a process. For example, if a writer has to write some dialogue, they know the basic content of the dialogue, feed that into GPT, that gives them a rough draft. Now many companies want to just make that the end of the process, and that’s really despicable. But if then the writer is able to go through and edit and proofread that draft until it’s basically all in their own words anyway, then the AI was just a labour saving device to create some basic structure from the outline.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m okay with them, if used responsibly. For example, AI generated settings could be very interesting, being able to expand games in ways we haven’t seen. However, I would like to see the original artists brought in and compensated for that work.

      Having NPCs have real generated dialog could be amazing. But those voice actors should be compensated fairly.

      Don’t blame the tech itself. The greed that’s driving it absolutely, but as a consumer I’ll say I’ll gladly put my money to games who use it responsibly