petrescatraian@libranet.de to Technology@beehaw.org · 8 days agoDeepseek when asked about sensitive topicsi.postimg.ccimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1295arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1295arrow-down1imageDeepseek when asked about sensitive topicsi.postimg.ccpetrescatraian@libranet.de to Technology@beehaw.org · 8 days agomessage-square83fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSnot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·edit-28 days ago The text is so fuckin small… Here’s an upscaled copy that is slightly more legible without having to blow the image up first:
minus-squareWaterWaiver@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 days agoIt looks identical to me. Same size before clicking, same size after right clicking -> Open image in new tab.
minus-squareSnot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 days agoThe original was 474x767 pixels, I upscaled it to 1000x1618 pixels. You can check the file info on each yourself.
minus-squareburgersc12@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 days agoCause “upscaling” the image doesn’t really work that well in a lot of cases, such as this.
minus-squareAatube@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 days agoI think you’re thinking about AI upscaling. The upscaled picture here is just normal upsampling (changing the dimensions without filling in any of the information blanks).
The text is so fuckin small…
Here’s an upscaled copy that is slightly more legible without having to blow the image up first:
It looks identical to me. Same size before clicking, same size after right clicking -> Open image in new tab.
The original was 474x767 pixels, I upscaled it to 1000x1618 pixels. You can check the file info on each yourself.
Cause “upscaling” the image doesn’t really work that well in a lot of cases, such as this.
I think you’re thinking about AI upscaling. The upscaled picture here is just normal upsampling (changing the dimensions without filling in any of the information blanks).