• Transcription:

    We use Unity to make our games.

    This would harm not only us, but fellow game studios of all budgets and sizes. If this goes through, we’d delay content and features our players actually want to port our game elsewhere (as others are also considering). But many developers won’t have the time or means to do the same.

    Stop it. Wtf?

    HEY GAMERS!

    Today, Unity (the engine we use to make our games) announced that they’ll soon be taking a fee from developers for every copy of the game installed over a certain threshold - regardless of how that copy was obtained.

    Guess who has a somewhat highly anticipated game coming to Xbox Game Pass in 2024? That’s right, it’s us and a lot of other developers.

    That means Another Crab’s Treasure will be free to install for the 25 million Game Pass subscribers. If a fraction of those users download our game, Unity could take a fee that puts an enormous dent in our income and threatens the sustainability of our business.

    And that’s before we even think about sales on other platforms, or pirated installs of our game, or even multiple installs by the same user!!!

    This decision puts us and countless other studios in a position where we might not be able to justify using Unity for our future titles. If these changes aren’t rolled back, we’ll be heavily considering abandoning our wealth of Unity expertise we’ve accumulated over the years and starting from scratch in a new engine. Which is really something we’d rather not do.

    On behalf of the dev community, we’re calling on Unity to reverse the latest in a string of shortsighted decisions that seem to prioritize shareholders over their product’s actual users.

    I fucking hate it here.

    -Aggro Crab

    (Small picture of crab holding a knife)

  • brsrklf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Out of the loop. What’s the change?

    From context it seems Unity is asking for a new fee per installed game, instead of using what the studio actually earned from the game?

    If so, yeah, I get how it would be terrible if your game got a sudden huge install base from gamepass or such.

    • mordack550@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It will ask a small fee for every install, on top of the royalties. The issue seems that for small studios this fee is not feasible, and it seems that also pirated games and demos would count

    • Cheers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      But also, what entitles them to even a portion of the games proceeds? Adobe doesn’t get a cut for every digital piece you create. Dundermifflin doesn’t get a cut everytime you write a new contract. That’s absolute bullshit and they should get a fine for even thinking they’re allowed to be this big and change the rules like this. That’s a monopoly mindset.

      • brsrklf@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess it really depends how it’s done. I don’t think an actual cut of the proceeds is fair either, but stuff like having a low entry point and scaling your tool’s cost a bit according to the project success can be a good idea.

        That said after they’d try to pull a stunt like they did I definitely wouldn’t trust them anymore.

    • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Also, trolls could delete and reinstall the app repeatedly, forcing the developer on the hook for large amounts of money to Epic games.