• ffmike@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bear in mind that Antenna (the source of this info) has no access to internal Netflix metrics, only to opt-in consumer information. We won’t really know what’s going on with Netflix’s numbers until their next quarterly report.

  • Whirrun617@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hot take but I think ultimately this will work out for them. Nobody is going to cancel their sub over this, because whoever is paying isn’t losing anything.

    The people who lose access to the account might not sign up, but it doesn’t exactly hurt Netflix if they don’t, they weren’t paying anyway.

  • luciole (he/him)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    (I never dare voice this opinion, but this is Beehaw so I’ll take a chance. Please be nice!) I understand piracy as a reaction against unfair corporate practice, but in the long run, with enough traction, this kills not only the distributor but the content creators as well.

    I worry for the artists and the craft. I don’t want free lunch. Whenever I get free lunch either my attention span is being sold as a product or someone can’t live from their work.

    I wish there would be some kind of Bandcamp for series/movies.

  • TheSwede@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No idea how accurate this report is. Either way people online tend to be a vocal minority. The vast majority of people using Netflix either aren’t on Reddit or other discussion forums, or are simply lurkers who never comment. I find that people that do comment tend to be doom and gloom when it comes to these sort of things. That applies to me too, as I certainly won’t buy Netflix due to their content.

    But Netflix is large enough that it will probably be fine for quite some time. Even so I do think streaming is declining rapidly due to too many services and studies have shown that people do pirate more when accessing content becomes tedious. It’s all a matter of comfort.

  • ArtZuron@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m honestly sort of suspicious of this report. I wouldn’t be surprised if the information is misrepresented or outright fabricated.

  • Mutelogic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a little buried in the account settings, but Netflix does allow account sharing for an additional fee (~$7?). I know families that went with this option so they could continue sharing their account with elderly parents, and college aged children.

    I imagine that if a group of friends agreed to split the cost of an account + fees, they would end up paying less than having individual accounts.

  • Sephi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I only use Netflix currently, as it comes with my phone plan. The convenience factor is nice, but I find the content library a bit lacking. I must explore Plex at some point.

      • wiredfire@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        How would you say Jellyfin compares to Plex? Just today installed Plex server so definitely early enough in the process to hop to a difference media server 😁

        • flintcedar@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In my android TV, the plex app updated the UI making the home screen showing more outside content instead of my own shows in my harddrive. Maybe there is a setting somewhere I need to fiddle.

          Took the chance to change to Jellyfin, did not change any folder structure and it worked fine. Most importantly my shows show up in home screen

        • Signfeld@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have not used Plex in years, however, just the fact that Jellyfin is FOSS is enough for me to want to use it more. I am not sure what features Plex has that Jellyfin doesn’t, but, it does everything it can do really well. Honestly, just throw it up next to Plex and see how you like it. Installation is a breeze, at least with Docker.

        • rothaine@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Last I checked (which admittedly was a few years ago), Plex was the only thing that could add subtitles to something being Chromecast’ed. That’s the primary way I watch things on my actual TV, and since apparently I’m deaf AF and need subtitles for everything, Plex was the best choice. The others would’ve required processing stuff with handbrake ahead of time.

          Bought a lifetime subscription though and it’s been well worth it.

          • wiredfire@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s apparently a plug-in for Jellyfin to do the subtitles download thing… haven’t tried it though

            • rothaine@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not even just the downloading–Chromecast needs some weird encoding or something, apparently?

        • skillful_garbage@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re both very similar, but they do have important differences.

          • Plex has a sleeker UI that is better for our less tech-savvy friends and family. I don’t mind JF’'s UI, but Plex definitely wins in this department.

          • Plex is easier to access from outside your home network, especially for those of us who do not have full control of our own internet. With Plex, you just open a port, specify it for Plex, and it takes care of the rest. JF on the other hand requires the user to specify the IP (or domain if you have one).

          • The first two points both result in a better experience for the end user as well. I don’t need to hold anyone’s hand when I invite them to the server, they can do it on their own. JF may not be as simple for some users.

          These are the reasons why I personally use Plex over JF. However, JF is still worth considering. You don’t need to pay to unlock any features, it’s all FOSS, and imo it’s more stable than Plex. It all comes down to personal preference and your situation. Hope that helps a bit!

          • wiredfire@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thank you for all that! I’ve given Jellyfin a go and So Far so good… does what I need and seems a little snapper than Plex. I think this will do me, and I’m not needing remote access or to share with anyone so hopefully no worries there heh 😁

  • aster@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The sad reality most of us who comment on social media and forums forget is we are just a vocal minority, majority of consumers don’t care for these outrages unfortunately. If the end product works good enough for most people then they will keep it/use it.