Bilb!

I honestly don’t think I could. I don’t think that’s an English word.

I don’t think its ethical to portray straight people in video games at all.

If “your” phone belongs to your employer that’s the choice you made. It isn’t yours.

To apple? Linux phone experience is just trash.

Nothing is forever

And life has been transformed! Everything is wonderful now!

Nintendo doesn’t really restrict things in that way. It would be very strange for them to block a game from publishing on switch for those reasons.

No, it’s set to whatever the default is. I’ll try what you suggest, thanks!

I’ve been spontaneously singing a lot

My only issue is that since the DLC was released I can no longer play online on linux. It says “Inappropriate behavior detected” no matter what. Didn’t even buy the DLC.

So the most accurate and helpful descriptor would be “mario-like 2d platformer,” but then you might have no reason to click on the link if you’re a weirdo who thinks “Oh, that might mean a game like Mario Party!” ;)

Yeah, I have the special edition that will include all of the DLC (It was a promotional gift from AMD) and you would have to pay me to play any of it.

More of this game is not something I’m interested in!

I think it fits, because it looks like it would feel exactly like Super Mario World.

I honestly don’t get the outage over that. I feel like I’m in the minority on that, though. I don’t care if linguistic statics are gathered from my public comments. Knock yourself out.

This story is about “private” messages on a free hosted service, and I think their users are just being naive if they think this is beyond the pale. But I get the feeling of violation at least a little.

I think you’re right, since a website like SteamHistory is definitely not going to bother establishing a representative in an EU state the only recourse would be to try to go through the US legal system and it’s far from clear to me how that would go. GDPR seems like it was written with actual businesses in mind, but SteamHistory isn’t exactly that. I think a business would want to comply or lose access to a valuable market, but there’s less leverage on a (seemingly) privately run web site.

Nothing.

As long as there are people who want to make games there will be indy game development going on.

People always say this, but the execs and board members making obscene money for doing as little a possible is the whole point of the endeavor.

People pretending it’s not useful and/or not improving all the time are living in their own worlds. I think you can argue the legality and the ethics, but any anti-ai position based on low quality output (“it can’t even do hands!”) has a short shelf-life.

What content is illegal?