• SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s gonna be shitty, expensive, AND buggy.

        Look forward to the disappointment or just accept that late stage capitalism has ruined all of our lives and everything that we enjoyed, and it’s only going to get worse.

        • Aux@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          That’s how every TES game was: shitty, expensive and buggy. With zero bugs fixed after a decade since the release. Bethesda is extremely consistent, I’ll give them that.

      • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        The horrible thing is that it doesn’t have to suck.

        Take Gamebryo, make Skyrim in a new map, new quests, scale it up for modern hardware a little, hire some voice actors and sell it. They could give everyone exactly what they expect.

        They just won’t. Everything has to be some grandiose overhaul for the sake of bullshit when it comes to Todd Howard and Microsoft.

  • Flamekebab@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    When I was really getting into PC gaming in 2003 a game from 14 years before would have been released in 1989. Yes, I’d say that was old!

  • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Let’s put it like this- Skyrim is as old now as Final Fantasy VII was when it came out. If you had asked me then if Final Fantasy VII was an old game when Skyrim came out, I’d have said yeah.

  • talos_the_true_god@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    Maybe an unpopular opinion, but I’m glad no new Elder Scrolls game is coming out. With the enshittification of Bethesda, the announcement of TES6 coming out would just hype everyone only for it to be a buggy, microtransaction-filled trashcan. See Starfield.

    I’m more hyped for Skyblivion than for TES6.

  • Mallspice@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yes but more that that, not just old games should be on GoG, all offline games should be on GoG.

      • cmhe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        You are inverting the logic there, all games on GoG are DRM free, but not all DRM free games are on GoG.

          • Mallspice@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I would say it’s essential for multiplayer games with servers because I wouldn’t want to host my games for free if I were a business and P2P connectivity is more hackable.

            • cmhe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              What? P2P is more hackable? Hacking just one central server is more difficult than hacking multiple P2P clients that check each other? That seems like strange reasoning. This really depends on the implementation, sure you can make it insecure, but you can also make it more secure.

              And why wouldn’t you want to host your own games when you want to play them together with others?

              Hosting your own games also gives you much more power over it, you can mod it more easily etc.

              IMO game developers of multiplayer games should also have to release dedicated servers to anyone that buys their game, so that they are still able to play the game, even if the game developer shuts the servers down, or their country is embargoed by the country where the game developer is located.

              • Mallspice@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                Depends on what you’re doing but yes because with p2p you don’t go through a server to implement a mod and you can break the game with less consequences.

                For example it’s way easier to mod Space Marine 2 than Marvel Rivals, even though you can mod Rivals, because the server is required for spotting cheaters and banning them in more serious or competitive settings. Hence why Rivals players can mod skins in with some effort, but are liable to be ip banned if they use an aimbot in comp.

  • MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    If I had a dog that was born in 2011 I would call him old.

    I personally think games age faster than dogs ¯_(ツ)_/¯

      • Decq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        So retro wouldn’t fit, as retro mean new in old-style. You’re looking for vintage

        • SolOrion@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          ‘Retro’ in a gaming sense is often used interchangeably with ‘Vintage’, as far as I can tell.

          The subreddit r/Retrogaming even has this gem on their sidebar:

          Retro Gaming: Reddit’s home of vintage gaming

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m looking forward to checking out the re-make that’s about to drop of one of my old favorite games. Lunar: Silver Star Story. I still have my PS1 version.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I kind of used the wrong word, really. They aren’t doing so much as they did with FF7. It’s more like just a re-master. It’ll run in wide-screen, have some qol improvements for inventory, upscale graphics, lots of music, audio, and cutscene improvements, and some other little stuff, as well as retro mode that will make it all look and sound and appear just like it was 30 years ago.

        I’ve been waiting for its release for like 6 months, but it actually drops just next week on ps4/ps5, pc, switch, and xbone.

        Even though I’ve been waiting, I’m not sure if I’ll get it next week right away or not. They’re releasing physical copies on amazon for $55, but the digital copy is still $50. I’m a PC gamer, so I’ll probably wait until that price gap is bigger if I’m only going to have a digital copy.

        Also, it’s Lunar 1 and 2 bundled together, so two classics.

  • Hafler@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s impossible for it to be old. They keep releasing it, making it new every time. Just last week, they announced that it will be released on my toaster this summer.

  • Elkot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    It is an old game, technically it was an old game when it was released