• SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Just downloaded it and skimmed by frames… Seems to be a list of reasons to degoogle. Mentions privacy, security, and how Google is extending fingers into everyone’s privacy by browser, password manager, wallet, phone, etc.

      • november@lemmy.vg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Guy’s an ass, but if this gets people on board with degoogling then good for him.

        • candyman337@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Really didn’t like him when he was younger, he was a naive swedish kid that didn’t realize that the dumb shit he said online had ramifications because his audience was so big. He helped platform Ben Shapiro to a younger generation when he had him on his channel for a video, he had that scandal where he said the n word, and then of course the clip where he says the glass ceiling doesn’t exist. It’s clear to me he didn’t realize the cultural and political ramifications of that stuff in America because he was never really exposed to it growing up in Sweden, and he was a cocky 20 something that thought he knew everything.

          I hope these days he’s realizing how idiotic some of that shit was and is actually trying to use his platform to make his viewers aware of valid issues rather than spouting off about topics he knows nothing about to his viewers who take his word as truth.

        • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’ve never watched him (I hated him when he would just scream at video games) but he seems to be a lot more mature these days. He even posted a video on why you should switch to Linux recently

          • TheFogan@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            58 minutes ago

            I mean I don’t really consider him a deplorable person… He was a dumb edgy teen 15 years ago that happened to strike a cord with the overwhelming amount of dumb edgy teens on youtube, and strike it rich. I haven’t paid a ton of attention to him, but from what I saw of his linux and gadget crafting videos, it sounds like he’s grown up a fair amount from his days of scream streaming.

  • maxwells_daemon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Download the video before YouTube takes it down. I want to see that site flooded with reuploads if they do.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I don’t care about his content, but I downloaded for historical preservation. If you’re willing to watch can you explain the beef?

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I just use down sub to pull the transcript from his video It’s only 60% as annoying.

        He has the normal privacy versus cost worries which are reasonably valid. Then he rambles on, plugs a product that he’s shilling that’s unrelated to the subject matter, says he’s replacing Google search with a local LLM, does some hot takes on alternatives, does some reasonable takes on some alternatives.

        To be honest, this is probably the least helpful de-googling video I’ve seen, other than the fact that he’s a major influencer and is telling everyone they should be doing it.

    • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If it stays up, it’s certainly going to be interesting seeing the difference in view counts between it and his other videos.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I was actually kinda wondering the other day why super large content creators with good cash flow from what they already do, don’t ditch Google and Patreon or anything else that takes a cut to be nothing more than a middleman to accessing the content? They don’t need to host on the same level as YouTube; they could probably make more money hosting their videos on their own website, where they can control what is free or paid for, and can work directly with advertisers themselves.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Putting a video file somewhere and letting 10,000 people watch it at the same time is no small feat.

      You could probably get away with doing it on peer tube but it has no facilities to lock people out or make them pay.

      Even if you don’t use patreon for payments payments aren’t free.

    • dmtalon@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      And how do they get big? How do they get discovered? SEO ?

      They’re getting huge because of the platform.

      I’m not saying google is not evil but it literally gives them their audience.

      I watch YT more than anything else by a mile, and if my top subscription moved to their website, and I had to jump through hoops to watch them on my TV device, by installing a browser or something I probably would stop watching them or watch them way less. Another TV friendly app sure that wouldn’t be a problem, but I don’t see many doing that.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I’m talking about those who have already gotten big, like PewDiePie or Good Mythical Morning (the latter of which started on their own website before youtube even existed, btw). Not the dude who just started a channel last week and has nothing to do shit with.

        • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          If they somehow even got 10% of their audience to go to another platform that would be a miracle

        • non_burglar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The lift of running your own platform is big. You just won’t believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it’s a long way down the road to the chemist’s, but that’s just peanuts to creating your own video hosting platform.

          • rebelrbl@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            It’s not that challenging with a partner to help manage infrastructure which even at his scale is not going to cost an obscene amount of money.

            Edit: there’s a very massive difference between a single content creator hosting their content and a site hosting everyone’s content like YouTube as well in terms of cost, infrastructure, security and management.

          • meyotch@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Websites work very well and are scalable af. A plugged in person with a track record like that could go Web 2.0 and probably net more.

            • non_burglar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              35 minutes ago

              You are correct. Websites, the stack to supply video encoding, even scalability is a solved problem.

              The hard work isn’t technical, it’s getting people onto your platform in the first place (marketing), getting people to continue using your platform (retention) and the perennial problems of SaaS evolving with other SaaS platforms (how many dev hours are you willing to eat trying to keep up with the Joneses?).

              SaaS, and in this case, SaaS offering content, is a losing game. You will either lose your shirt, sell your business, or become entrenched in a position whose inertia is difficult to break. How much of any of those you are willing to take a firehose of is the question.

              • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 minutes ago

                It’s not easy, but you’re not guaranteed to end up

                either lose your shirt, sell your business, or become entrenched in a position whose inertia is difficult to break

                It depends on the personalities involved and the business model they go with.

                Nebula has done really well with consistent growth as a premium offering where people pay one subscription fee to get ad-free videos from exclusively high-quality creators across a quote broad range of niches, in addition to bonus extras and Nebula Originals.

                Dropout seems to have a lot of success with a range of mostly unscripted comedy, centred around a core cast of trusted comedic actors with a larger range of guests.

                Floatplane, on the other hand, seems much less successful, probably owing to its business model being basically Patreon’s, but only for video. Instead of the wide range of content you get for surprisingly reasonable amounts of Nebula and Dropout, Floatplane ends up looking very expensive if you want to support more than one or two creators. Plus the creators on it haven’t got the same degree of trust; it ends up reeking of the sort of techbro vibes that people are explicitly trying to get away from.

        • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 hours ago

          YouTube still offers them a service in directing them new viewers. The big creators all lose viewers but YouTube funnels replacement views faster than they lose. They could host their own videos but they are gonna see very little growth without Google either in search or with YouTube as they start to lose the base that followed them.

          They also won’t be able to negotiate as good as rates for pre-rolls or in video sponsorships as if they were on YouTube.

          The only real alternative would be to band together like the creators that are a part of nebula are doing. Hosting on peertube really isn’t an option unless you are independently supported and you are doing it as a passion project and don’t care about audience growth or retention.

        • dmtalon@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Still think building their own site with apps I can throw on my devices is pretty involved.

    • DolphinMath@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Streaming video is expensive. LTT did it with Floatplane, even going so far as to develop their own backend. Watcher and some other YouTubers did it with Vimeo as their backend, but Vimeo still takes a large cut.

      At the end of the day, people are doing this, but YouTube still offers a compelling value compared to other platforms. It’s hard to beat their scale, sophistication, and the discoverability of their platform.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Well, there is Nebula, which is kinda like that. But most of them also put their videos on YouTube, using Nebula as the premium ad-free option with a little bonus content.

  • Novocirab@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    That’s very cool indeed – although I dread the moment he starts talking to his followers about Lemmy.

      • TheFogan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        56 minutes ago

        I mean, I don’t know of him now… he’s way older and, seems significantly less immature than he was in the past, it’s possible a good portion of his fanbase has also grown to be more tolerable.